[var.media_title;onformat=retitle]

The Olympus 45 f/1.2 pro geeks out a win with better color and shaper wide open performance but I may prefer the Bokeh here from the Nocticron.

△ 45 Pro的遮光罩是塑膠的，坦白說還蠻沒質感的... 跟P家42.5mm F1.2的金屬遮光罩比起真的是輸到連車尾燈都看不到XDD

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm F1.8 vs LEICA DG NOCTICRON 42.5mm / F1.2 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. 鏡頭規格比較, 價錢比較, 重量比較, 電量比較, 性能大對決.

First, and most importantly for how I shoot, the minimum focus distance on the P 42.5mm is MUCH closer than the Oly 45mm. This makes it considerably easier to ...

Also, it's well known that the Nocticron is much sharper than the 45/1.8, something you wouldn't necessarily see in portraits, but is quite ...

Panasonic Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm F1.2 ASPH on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f1.8 on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II ; DXOMARK Score.

Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f1.8 on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs Panasonic Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm F1.2 ASPH on Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II · DXOMARK Score.

Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron 或Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm F1.2 PRO 會選擇哪一隻~兩隻訂價也差不多~ 感覺Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45mm F1.

I liked the out-of-focus characteristics of the Olympus 45/1.2 better, so I ended up buying that one. I've been quite happy with that choice so far.

If you want the best sharpness, best construction quality feel, natural looking bokeh, better contrast, and better overall IQ then the Leica 42.5mm is the one.